Skip to content

Directory

Research and data

Classify, rank, search, and extract across large collections of messy data.

Research and data·Showing 37 of 420 entries
All builds
Ian Nuttall

Ian Nuttall

@iannuttall

Cloudflare Workers has Jev now so I'm putting it to the test on keep.md - 7x faster search rerank compared to the current hybrid - 50x faster tagging of content vs GLM 4.7 Flash with no failures

Search and tagging on keep.md

XResearch and data

Search and tagging on keep.md

Rerank
7x faster
Tagging
50x faster
Albiona Hoti

Albiona Hoti

@albicodes

I built a visual reference finder with Jev One single prompt → 100 images from Cosmos, NASA, and The Met my new rabbit hole for creative work 🌻

A visual reference finder

XResearch and data

A visual reference finder

Per prompt
100 images
生ビール

生ビール

@wmoto_ai

生ビール

A local Jev

XResearch and data

A local Jev

Hamilton Ulmer

Hamilton Ulmer

@hamiltonulmer

I made a DuckDB extension where you can use @typesafeai 's Jev to do quick classification of rows in any csv/parquet file or duckdb table about 10sec for 1k rows ~ better than using an LLM, way more ergonomic than a classifier game-changing for data analysis!

Classify rows in DuckDB

XResearch and data

Classify rows in DuckDB

Time
~10 s per 1k rows
Pierre-Eliott Lallemant

Pierre-Eliott Lallemant

@pierreeliottlal

JEV is insanely fast. We gave it a massive dataset based on thousands of outreach messages and asked: Which intent signals generated the most booked demos? 40 seconds later, we had the answer. Cost: less than $0.20. JEV can also rank leads, measure prospect-message fit, and uncover what actually drives campaign performance. Coming soon to @GojiberryAI + MCP.

Which outreach signals book demos

XResearch and data

Which outreach signals book demos

Time
40 s
Cost
<$0.20
Marc Köhlbrugge

Marc Köhlbrugge

@marckohlbrugge

Using Jev to filter through my @wip todos It allows me to super quickly find all the instances where I increased revenue, got stuck, switched to a different SaaS provider, etc Things a regular keyword search would never catch

Filtering WIP todos by meaning

XResearch and data

Filtering WIP todos by meaning

Justine Moore

Justine Moore

@venturetwins

Jev can serve as better natural language search on websites. It can scan thousands of Zillow listings and classify properties by things you can't normally filter for - e.g. architecture, renovation status, proximity to freeways. This was done in <20 sec and costs $0.18 👇

Natural-language search over Zillow

XResearch and data

Natural-language search over Zillow

Time
<20 s
Cost
$0.18
Hamed Valigholizadeh

Hamed Valigholizadeh

@hametgholizadeh

JEV IS INSANE. I gave it 80 real exam questions and 297 practice ones. In 80 seconds, it told me which ones are most likely to appear on the real exam and which ones aren’t. All for $0.0256. Can't stop playing with @typesafeai 😁

Which exam questions come back

XResearch and data

Which exam questions come back

Questions
377
Time
80 s
Cost
$0.0256
Trinay Hari

Trinay Hari

@hari_trinay

Built a construction plan-set classifier with Jev. Proq turns civil and building plan sets into bills of materials using an LLM pipeline we built on GPT-4.1. Jev classified an entire 26-sheet plan set in 2.9 seconds for $0.0052. It matched GPT-4.1 and GPT-6 Astra on 100% of sheet-level classifications while running 17–21x cheaper and 5x faster than our production pipeline.

A 26-sheet plan set in 2.9 seconds

XResearch and data

A 26-sheet plan set in 2.9 seconds

Sheets
26
Time
2.9 s
Cost
$0.0052
Sabrina

Sabrina

@sabrinaesaquino

Jev is now live on the Venice API. Watch it classify 24,000 Hacker News posts into 12 categories in about 2 minutes

24,000 Hacker News posts in two minutes

XResearch and data

24,000 Hacker News posts in two minutes

Posts
24,000
Categories
12
Run time
~2 min
OpenRouter

OpenRouter

@OpenRouter

1/ Jev, a decision model by @typesafeai, sparked a burst of projects and discussion. We tested it using Ori Eval against popular LLMs on OpenRouter at judging. Jev was >5x faster than the next fastest model, and even its slowest requests beat every other model's median.

OpenRouter’s Ori Eval

XResearch and data

OpenRouter’s Ori Eval

Speed
>5× the next fastest
Vincent Wang-Maścianica

Vincent Wang-Maścianica

@vinnylarouge

I reverse-engineered a jev-like architecture given its type. You can find the repo here to train your own jevlikes: github.com/vinnylarouge/j…

jevlike

XResearch and data

jevlike

Eric Zhang

Eric Zhang

@ekzhang1

Inspired by @typesafeai , here is a Jev-compatible public API to play with It runs a comparable open model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B), and just uses SGLang radix cache to preserve the prefill reuse / really fast parallel systemone generation - 64 tasks in <1s. github.com/ekzhang/openje…

openjev-sglang

XResearch and data

openjev-sglang

Throughput
64 tasks <1 s
GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

reflex

XResearch and data

reflex

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

jev-search

XResearch and data

jev-search

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

ensk

XResearch and data

ensk

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

jev-reviewer

XResearch and data

jev-reviewer

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

duckdb-jev

XResearch and data

duckdb-jev

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

pg_typesafe

XResearch and data

pg_typesafe

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

Jev Capability Atlas

XResearch and data

Jev Capability Atlas

Ateeq

Ateeq

@TPateeq

I used Jev to solve a problem every agent eventually runs into: reading logs. 22.8M lines, and running an LLM on every one would've cost $1,120. Tocsin groups them into 11,812 repeating patterns, then asks Jev about each pattern once. 6 minutes, 64 cents, 123 patterns that actually needed to be looked at. http://github.com/TPAteeq/tocsin The paging policy is just a prompt. You tell it what should wake someone up at 3 am and what's just another log line.

Tocsin

XResearch and data

Pick

Tocsin

Lines
22.8M
Time
6 min
Cost
$0.64
GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

XResearch and data

jev-align

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

XResearch and data

OpenJev Verdict 2.0

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

XResearch and data

jev-evaluation

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

XResearch and data

visual-jev

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

XResearch and data

jevchat

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

XResearch and data

OpenJev

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

XResearch and data

open-spark-jev

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

XResearch and data

ChatJev

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

XResearch and data

jeval

GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

@GitHub·Research and data

GitHub·Research and data

XResearch and data

jev-acento

Hassan

Hassan

@nutlope

I used Jev to classify 1,018 AI research papers. The result: $0.08 total cost and 256ms median end-to-end latency per paper. The pipeline was: 1. Summarize each paper with DeepSeek V4 Flash 2. Send the title + summary + 24 possible topics to Jev 3. Use Jev to classify each paper 4. Visualize everything on http://1kpapers.com The summaries cost $3.99 on @togethercompute. The classifications cost $0.08 on @typesafeai. So for just over $4 of inference, I ended up with a pretty useful way to explore the top AI research papers from the past year. I think this is where things are heading: different models for different parts of the workflow, instead of using one model for everything. I’m running evals on the Jev classifications before replacing the current ones, but the site is already live: http://1kpapers.com

1kpapers

XResearch and data

1kpapers

Documents
1,018 papers
Total cost
$0.08
Median latency
256 ms
alex nikolic

alex nikolic

@justALEXWORTEGA

Typesafe: pnewed 💨 Jev: liberated 🫡 I trained an MLP on top of qwen 4b and it works literally like JEV huggingface.co/AlexWortega/op…

openjev on Qwen 4B

XResearch and data

openjev on Qwen 4B

GitHub · Research and data
openjev: Local Non-Autoregressive Decision Engine

openjev: Local Non-Autoregressive Decision Engine

An open-source PyTorch / vLLM implementation experimenting with RLCD (Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions) on small base weights.

Decision

Classify document sentiment and topic category simultaneously.

1800 rps · 3.2 GB VRAMSource
1kpapers: AI Paper Ranker
SITE · Research and data
Pick

1kpapers: AI Paper Ranker

Hassan’s viral app classifying and ranking over 1,000 ArXiv papers each morning into crisp domain categories with calibrated novelty scores.

Decision

Evaluate paper abstract and rank novelty score against current SOTA research tracks.

1,000 papers in 38s · $0.06Live Site (1kpapers.com)
SKILL · Research and data

Obsidian Note Classifier & Linker

Obsidian vault plugin running locally that suggests relevant backlinks and folder categories for atomic notes in real time.

Decision

Which semantic folder and tag hierarchy best fits this markdown note?

Zero cloud latency · Works offlineGitHub
GitHub · Research and data
Pick
typesafe-rag-router: Semantic Hybrid Search Gate

typesafe-rag-router: Semantic Hybrid Search Gate

A sub-10ms decision layer that decides whether user queries need dense vector embeddings, BM25 exact match, or direct cache.

Decision

Which retrieval index is optimal for this query complexity?

9.4 ms routing · 80% embedding cost savedSource